Cash advances May Be Less Expensive Than Overdrafts
Wednesday, August 4th, 2010We have written extensively about the problem of cash advance loans and how the business charges rates of interest of 500-1000% from customers who often cannot afford to borrow money somewhere else. The industry is well controlled in a few states and ignored in others, but one thing remains constant - customers take out those high interest loans because they wish to. No one forces them to do it and the lenders are required by law to fully disclose the terms of the loan ahead of time. In short, the individuals, for better or worse, understand what they are buying.
That’s not necessarily the case with overdraft loans or overdraft “protection” as it is frequently called. Many banks now include such protection as a built-in feature of their checking accounts. If a customer writes a check or makes a debit card purchase for more cash than he or she has in their account, the bank will recognize the transaction. The customer will then be billed a fee for the overdraft. The fees vary from bank to bank, but typically range from $20-35 for each transaction. A $35 fee, repaid in two weeks’ time, amounts to 910% interest annually. If the customer repays within a week, the effective annual rate of interest is an unbelievable 1820%. Compared to such rates, payday loans are cheaper.
The ability to draw more cash than you might have in your account is useful, we suppose, especially in light of the fact that few people ever balance their checkbook correctly. That being the case, few individuals know how much money they are supposed to have in their account, making overdrafts all the more probable. The problem is that banks instantly include this protection feature and don’t permit customers to “opt out” of it. Furthermore, the customer gets no alert if he or she is about to overdraw their account. It just happens, and the fee is automatically assigned.
This is lucrative business for banks, which takes in more than ten billion dollars a year in overdraft fees alone. This is lucrative lending, but unlike quick cash loans, customers don’t usually realize that they are even borrowing cash. If they did, they might be less likely to do so, especially if they knew that overdrawing an account by $5 still requires a $35 fee. Would anyone take out a $500 cash advance loan if the fee were $700? Probably not.
In an perfect world, banks might be required by law to notify customers that such protections are in place. They would also be required to allow customers opt out if they elect to do so. Given the current climate in Washington and Congress’ rather favorable view of the banking and lending industries, it appears unlikely that any laws along these lines will come along any time soon. For the time being, we recommend that customers maintain their checkbooks a bit more diligently.